In 2009 Kelly Clarkson did a magazine cover for the magazine SELF.
In it, she was photo-shopped so much that it changed her complete look and weight making her real body seem undesirable.
A link to the article can be seen
here and even has the magazine quoting:
“Yes. Of course we do retouching,” she writes. “Did we alter her appearance? Only to make her look her personal best.”
It had me scrolling through other articles that talked about magazines and how they create an idea of perfection that is completely unachievable. If this is what is being shown to us, is any of our ideal bodies even real? I myself always want to be a bit thinner, a bit buffer, better skin on my face, better hair...but has anyone got this? Is it only possible through digital remodelling? If so why isn't this being told to us? Is the industry making so much money out of us trying to make ourself feel better by running up a never ending hill that our health comes last? All these questions kept flooding through my mind.
I finally found an article with a bit of hope. In some magazines in France, a place where fashion and models Im sure is plagued into the mainstream, the magazine must show a bronze, silver or gold ring at the bottom of the photo-shoot picture. Bronze means slightly altered, silver means quite and gold means a lot. At least in some areas they are seeing the harm it can do to young people, as for others, well, they're just another way of profit.